Superglue
is one of the unusual heroes of Forensic Science. In an episode of the BBC’s
Death in Paradise, the detective uses it to develop a some fingermarks from
inside a pair of surgical gloves.
Did
I just say FINGERMARK rather than fingerprint? Well yes, I think the entire
cohort I took my course with learned that lesson on the first semester end of term paper – it
was -½ a point for each time we made
that mistake.
To
be clear:
FINGERPRINTS
are the clear, complete images taken at a police station by a dedicated
officer.
FINGERMARKS
are the dodgy half imprints left behind at a crime scene.
Superglue
or rather Cyanoacrylate fuming is primarily used for non-porous surfaces like
that surgical glove mentioned about. And of course, the readiest form of
cyanoacrylate is superglue. The method was discovered in the late 1970s by the
US army stationed in Japan. The cyanoacrylate reacts with moisture to create a
hard coating over the lines in the latent fingerprints, and it prevents the
mark from accidentally being rubbed away. If you have a big enough ‘fuming
cabinet’ it can hold a lot of items that need processing making it a cost
effective volume processor for when a number articles are held as evidence. The
fuming process produces a faint white mark that requires an extra stain in
order to see the print. The vapour also leaves a white residue on surfaces of
the cabinet. The fumes from superglue are noxious but not toxic[i].
So who had the brilliant idea about fingerprints in the first place? Sir William Herschel, a British Administrator in India, used fingerprints in1858 to validate civil contracts. The first use in a criminal investigation was in 1891 by an Argentine police official, Juan Vucetich, who used a fingerprint on a door frame to prove a woman had killed her own sons[ii]. In 1901, Scotland Yard adopted the use of fingerprints in identifying criminals, although the fictional detective Sherlock Holmes used fingerprints to solve crimes in stories published before then[iii].
The
main issue with fingerprints is they are often ‘latent’, which means hard to
see, and require some form of enhancement. The oldest method of fingerprint
analysis is the use of silver nitrate. On exposure to sunlight the white silver
nitrate, bound to the Chloride in the latent fingerprint, turns black. However,
after about a week details in the fingerprint fade and this makes it difficult
to make a long-term fingerprint data base. Which is why, nobody uses this
method anymore[iv].
The
other main method in use at the moment is Ninhydrin dye. Ninhydrin dye is
attracted to ammonia and primary and secondary amines – compounds with nitrogen
in them – in the sweat residue of fingerprints. The advantage of ninhydrin is that
it can be used to enhance a fingerprint on porous paper, as well as the non-porous
surfaces that superglue works on. The porous substance is dipped in ninhydrin
dye and left to dry – usually for 48 hours but this can be hurried along by
warming, as in the case of this experiment. Once dry, the fingerprint is
displayed by a deep purple colour called Ruhemann’s Purple, after the man who
first noted the effect in 1910. It is also good for enhancing old fingerprints,
but the reagents are expensive. As the ninhydrin remains on the treated surface
further prints can develop if it is incorrectly handled[v].
Ninhydrin is toxic and an irritant. If gloves are not worn when handling the
ninhydrin coated paper then the holder’s fingers will also turn purple.
There are other methods of developing fingerprints but they tend to be more expensive like gold plating the fingerprint, which is long-lasting but not practical for everyday police work.
For those of you for whom this is not new information, I had never watched an episode of CSI or other serious cop shows. I walked into the Graduate Fair at the University of Strathclyde expecting to sign up for a Pharmaceutical MSc or other Bioscience. Somehow, I ended up getting talked into Forensic Science. I started that course from cold, 30 years after finishing my BSc (hons) Biochemistry, 20 years after I had to give up laboratory work to care for my Autistic son.
And I loved it.
So to me superglue is marvellous, the cheap and cheerful method of storing fingerprints and fingermarks to create a decent database.
[i]
Penven, Don. (2015) ‘Developing latent prints with super glue’, Crime Scene
Investigator Network. February 27. [Online] available at https://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/cyanoacrylate-fuming-a-mainstay-of-crime-scene-investigation.html
(accessed 28/09/2019)
[ii] ‘History
of Fingerprints’ (2018) Crime Scene Forensics, LLC, Concord, NC; www.crimescene-forensics.com
[Online] available at http://www.crimescene-forensics.com/History_of_Fingerprints.html
(accessed 28/09/2019).
[iii]O’Brien, James. (2014) ‘Sherlock Holmes: Pioneer in
Forensic Science’, Encyclopædia
Britannica, Inc, March 31 [Online] available at https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sherlock-Holmes-Pioneer-in-Forensic-Science-1976713 (accessed 28/09/2019).
[iv] ‘Chemical
detection Techniques’ (2019) Australian police.com [Online] available at https://www.australianpolice.com.au/dactyloscopy/fingerprint-detection-and-enhancement/chemical-detection-techniques/
(accessed28/09/2019).
[v] ‘Ninhydrin
– visualizing of fingerprints’ (2019) Eviscan. German eForensics. [Online]
available at https://www.eviscan.com/en/glossary/ninhydrin-visualizing-of-fingerprints/
(accessed 28/09/2019)